Evidence

Every answer shows its work.

Software should not get to say "walk away from this job" and leave it there. Check two of the references yourself and you will know what the third is worth.

Commercial Development, Core & Shell / TI 1,732 pp · 13 in scope · 3 out Go

What it found

Exterior facade perforated metal panel system (MP-01) In scope

Panel details, corner and end conditions, and clip, bracket and hat-channel connections, across every level and sector of the structure.

“55 EXTERIOR FACADE PERFORATED PANELS, SEE DETAILS ON SHEET A-903” p.22

Cited p.323 +34 pages A-903

Decorative perforated panels on crash walls In scope

At grade level and along the site perimeter, picked up from keynotes rather than from a schedule.

“219 DECORATIVE PERFORATED PANELS ON CRASH WALL” p.10

Cited p.91 +15 pages 1/7A-806

Custom fabricated aluminum address numbers Out of scope

Aluminum, fabricated, custom. And signage, not architectural metal, so it stays off your plate.

“Address Numbers: Provide fabricated aluminum graphic numbers” p.473

Cited p.473 10 10 10

The whole package, one cell per page

35 gold cells out of 1,732. Each one is a page worth opening, at full size, on the page the callout sits on. The rest never get touched.

Real analysis

Actual output on a 1,732-page package, de-identified. Confirmpermission before this goes public.

What a citation is

A page number, not a paraphrase.

The sheet it was found on

Opened at full size, on the page the callout sits on.

The words off the drawing

Quoted as written, not summarised into something smoother.

The spec section

So you can argue with it in the language of the set.

What it could not find

A missing detail sheet gets flagged, not guessed at.

Next step

Run it on a bid you already reviewed.

The fastest way to find out what the citations are worth is to check them against work you did yourself.

Book a call How it works